Do You Trust Your Banker?

Jeff Evans

Every so often, I hear a story that really quite shocks me. I have mentioned in various writings over the past few years about reasons why someone should be cautious when dealing with bank lenders, and I have a good summary about it (although I could probably add more as time has gone by and I continue to hear more) in this page about banks vs mortgage brokers.

However, this one was different, and goes far beyond anything I could imagine one of the chartered banks in this country doing and being able to get away with. A few weeks ago, I was invited to go to an open house by a realtor in Vancouver. It was a strata property, and when I got there she had mentioned she had a client to that she sold to 10 years previous and thought it would be a good idea to go say hello. I came along with her when she went and knocked on the door. The realtor’s client was home and let us in.

This lady was about 80 years old and lived alone. She did not have any family around that she could trust. She had also had some health issues over the past few years, particularly on the mental side, and although she had said she was better and still seemed fairly aware, I did not have the perception that she was at her peak mental capacity.

While she is talking to the realtor, she comes out at a certain point and says “I don’t own this property anymore, I needed some money. I now get $100/month until I die, and then they get the property.” This seemed curious to us as she was still living in the property, which I would not believe she would do if she was actually not the owner of the property anymore. The realtor had to go back to the listing to show it to some interested parties, and I stayed and worked through what happened.

It turns out that the client still owned the property. The lady went to her bank (one of the large chartered banks). She had clear title on her property. That bank did not give her a mortgage, but instead arranged a mortgage for her through the Canadian Home Income Plan (CHIP). I also offer CHIP mortgages, and they have their place and are a legitimate option for some people. However, they are not for everyone. The interest on the mortgage accrues against the property compounding as the owner of the property never has to make a payment on the mortgage.

I saw the CHIP document that showed that she had gotten approximately $150,000 from the CHIP mortgage. However, they do not give a monthly installment payment, and if they did I would expect that the return would be better than $100/month on $150,000.

After a few meetings and a number of hours, I had gotten the whole story. The fund was to pay off her son’s mortgage when he wasn’t making payments on his property. The CHIP loan was arranged and after it was completed the bank’s financial planner convinced the client to not pay off the son’s mortgage but to put the money into mutual funds and then do a monthly distribution which would mostly cover the son’s mortgage payment. Therefore she was paying 4+% interest on her son’s mortgage and was losing money on her investment and the investment amount had eroded to the point where there was barely enough money left to pay out the son’s mortgage if she even wanted to, which is the reason she supposedly got the CHIP mortgage.

When I represent my clients to a lender, I try to provide a solution that works for everyone, and particularly for my client. I provide options and give them a choice. What her bank did was exploit and steal money from an old lady with a declining mental capacity. By the letter of the law I am sure they could justify their actions, that they did all they had to do to cover themselves and say it was a legitimate strategy. By the spirit of the law, what they did was reprehensible.

Why did they do this? Why did they have no moral qualms about a client taking out a mortgage loan and then putting her into a losing investment?

Author: Jeff Evans

I am a mortgage broker, hair salon owner, squash player, student, and husband, aspiring to do good for people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

home buyer mortgage broker
First Time Home Buyers Mortgage Broker Tips And Tricks
Jeff Evans
No Comments

Among the services I provide to my clients, I consider myself to be a "first-time home buyer mortgage broker".  As a first time home buyer mortgage broker, I know how difficult it is to get into the real estate market, particularly in Vancouver, and it brings me a particular amount of job to help someone get past the challenges if being a first time home buyer.

I have recently completed an e-book and will be launching it soon.  I believe it will be very helpful for not just first-time home buyers, but for anyone who is not as knowledgeable in residential mortgage lending, about how to make your home buyer mortgage broker application appealing to a mortgage lender.

As a sneak preview, here are three tips on improving your mortgage application as a first-time home buyer.

3 Home Buyer Mortgage Broker Tips

  1. Take advantage of the home-buyers plan to fund your down-payment.  This program is not technically ONLY for first-time home buyers, but all first-time home buyers are eligible.  Under the plan, you can borrow up to $25,000 from your RRSP for the purchase of an owner-occupied residence.  If you and your spouse are both applying, then you can withdraw $25,000 each. It is a loan, so it has to be paid back over 15 years (or 1/15th of the loan will be added to income for that year).  However, there is no withholding when you withdraw it, it does not have to all be declared as income on any given year, and you don't even have to use all of it for down-payment!  You can use it for any purpose that you need it for. A good mortgage broker, like myself, can help you with some of the finer details and complex situations that often arise from these situations.
  2. Make sure you pay your bills on time. If you have a high balance on your loan, or you have a lot of debt, those also have a significant negative impact on your credit score, but you can get the bills down and there is no record of your high debt levels.  However, when you miss a bill payment, it stays on your credit bureau for 6-7 YEARS.  This not just negatively impacts your credit score, but lenders look at this when assessing risk, and they have been particularly uncompromising and (unreasonable, paranoid, strict...and other words that I cannot put in print) in the last few years.  While you likely do not have to wait 6-7 years to become bankable if you have had gone through a period of bad credit, the less negative credit on the bureau, the better. At least make the minimum required payments and you will go a long way to making yourself appealing to them.
  3. Having no credit is just as bad as having bad credit. Many people feel that not requiring credit should prove your ability to pay your bills and should be good evidence of credit-worthiness.  This is not how mortgage lenders think.  If you currently do not have any credit, then you do not have any documentation that you are an acceptable credit risk, and no matter how strong your income is, you will have difficulty obtaining a prime mortgage approval.  Make sure you have at least 3 different credit facilities in your name.  (Secondary credit cards in a spouses name are not considered acceptable for establishing your credit).

I am excited to launch my home buyer mortgage broker e-book soon, in which I go into much greater detail and give many different ideas to help home buyers prepare for home ownership, but as a mortgage broker in Vancouver, you are welcome to contact me in the meantime to discuss your circumstances and see if there are any options for you.

mortgage broker Vancouver BC
Good news regarding OSFI rule changes
Jeff Evans
No Comments

This is just a quick note to let viewers know that IF you are one of the people with 20% or more down-payment and are in a position that the new OSFI rule changes affect your pre-qualification, that I can extend the current guidelines into the new year by up to 120 days provided that I have an application and am able to get a pre-approval in place with a lender for you before January 1.Read More

OSFI B20 mortgage guideline changes 2017 – Part 2
Jeff Evans
No Comments

This is a continuation of the article published here about the OSFI B20 morgage guidline changes for 2017.

If you are familiar with mortgage brokers at all (which you probably aren't) you would know that we also have alternative sources of lending for situations where a mortgage borrower will not qualify with a prime institution.  We have what we call "B" lenders, who have higher rates but more flexible lending criteria, and we have private lenders, which are individuals and corporations who can lend money on on anything that suits them.Read More