Can taxing absentee owners fix Vancouver’s housing shortage? – Georgia Straight

Jeff Evans

In my article yesterday, I had alluded to a story on the news about up to 25% of downtown Vancouver condo units being vacant. On the Georgia Straight website, there is an article also about this, and about a mayoral candidate that is campaigning to have vacant condos subject to a higher property tax.

The idea behind taxing absentee owners is to make Vancouver’s real-estate market a less attractive place to park offshore money. The revenue the city would take in from such a tax would go towards creating affordable housing, says Wong.

It is an interesting situation. It is understandable that having 1/4 of the houses in the city vacant will drive up the cost of renting to a potentially artificial level. The logic from a municipality’s perspective is sound, and its a demographic that is kind of easy to go after. However, will it be likely that people who are leaving their homes vacant will then occupy them or sell them? I believe that this is not likely, and at the end would basically represent a tax grab by the municipalities. The question that the article raises is also whether it would be legal or enforceable to do so.

The concern about discouraging foreign investment was also raised in the article. I do not agree that it would discourage foreign investment in Vancouver. In the sense that rising real estate prices will benefit the owners of homes in Vancouver, it does make sense that many Vancouver residents are beneficiaries of this foreign investment. However, it is also pricing many people out of the market at the same time, and those who do not even live here most of the time are most likely not starting businesses or creating jobs here either. Furniture stores, automobile dealerships and condo developers are likely the main beneficiaries of this foreign investment. Beyond the trickle-down effect that comes from that, I don’t believe there is a benefit derived from this status.

However, I tend to find that when governments try to get involved in matters like the free market, the results are not often desired. Having the government own or build “affordable housing” is a recipe for disaster. I believe the Vancouver Olympic Village was supposed to be “affordable housing”…and the city appears to be on the hook for a $300 million loss on that project.

Housing in Vancouver is a very complex issue, and I don’t believe it has a straight-forward answer. From a mortgage perspective, I have long advocated that mortgage lending policies should make it easier for the average person to own, and if the government wishes to cool the market, they should take care to what demographic of the population they are making it more difficult for. I do not believe they have taken this care since 2008, and as a result their policies have served to take people out of the market. These policy changes have not had a negative effect on wealthy investors, but on the person trying to save 5% for down-payment and paying an exorbitantly high rent.

 

Author: Jeff Evans

I am a mortgage broker, hair salon owner, squash player, student, and husband, aspiring to do good for people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

mortgage broker Vancouver BC
Good news regarding OSFI rule changes
Jeff Evans
No Comments
This is just a quick note to let viewers know that IF you are one of the people with 20% or more down-payment and are in a position that the new OSFI rule changes affect your pre-qualification, that I can extend the current guidelines into the new year by up to 120 days provided that I have an application and am able to get a pre-approval in place with a lender for you before January 1.Read More
OSFI B20 mortgage guideline changes 2017 – Part 2
Jeff Evans
No Comments
This is a continuation of the article published here about the OSFI B20 morgage guidline changes for 2017. If you are familiar with mortgage brokers at all (which you probably aren't) you would know that we also have alternative sources of lending for situations where a mortgage borrower will not qualify with a prime institution.  We have what we call "B" lenders, who have higher rates but more flexible lending criteria, and we have private lenders, which are individuals and corporations who can lend money on on anything that suits them.Read More
OSFI B20 mortgage guideline changes 2017 – Part 1
Jeff Evans
1 Comment

B20?  Is that some kind of vitamin?

It certainly sounds like a vitamin, but unfortunately, it is something else altogether.  The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions is the regulator for all federal mortgage lending institutions.  They set the regulations for mortgage companies like banks to follow (or ignore). The latest updates to the B20 mortgage regulations could bring some potentially very disrupting changes to the real estate market, especially if you are wanting to get a mortgage in Vancouver, or you are a mortgage broker in Vancouver. In summary:Read More